|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:39:09 GMT -5
The story of Jesus was well known thousands of years before the founding of the Roman Empire in 753BCE, and the source of the story was Egypt. Revelations 11:8 And their dead bodies [shall lie] in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. Hosea 13:4 Yet I [am] the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for [there is] no saviour beside me. We know that the Book of Revelation was once known as "THE MYSTERIES OF OSIRIS AND ISIS" and that it was so popular with the Roman public that in 510BCE, the Roman Senate purchased it from the Cumaean Sibyl, who was named 'Herophile'. (Refer: 'The Crucifixion of Truth' by Tony Bushby, pgs. 40 to 43.) Thus 'Our Lord' in Revelations 11:8 is a reference not to the 'Johnny cum lately' of the New Testament, but to the Egyptian God UASAR* who was with his Son and Ka, the One God or Holy Trinity. (See RESURRECTION ASCENSION TRINITY KING YMNTWTANKH) *Egyptian name that is better known to us today in the Greek 'OSIRIS'. The very name of Jesus has its origin in Egypt. To understand exactly how this name was formed, we need to know a little about Egyptian God Names. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:42:00 GMT -5
The very name of Jesus has its origin in Egypt. To understand exactly how this name was formed, we need to know a little about Egyptian God Names. Egyptian names usually had a 'God Name', something like Christian names. Just like Christian Saints, the One Egyptian God was seen to have many different characteristics each of which was given a different name. So as a Creator, God was seen as a Potter, and so, was called 'PTAH'. As a God of knowledge, learning and writing, he was known as 'DJAYHWT' (In Hebrew, 'DAVID') and was depicted with the head of an Ibis Here we have the Cartouche of Aqenenre. The Red Sun Disc was an overall name for God, 'Ra', or 'Re'. God names were generally written first though sometimes spoken at the end of the name as we see in this case. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:46:25 GMT -5
The God Name 'Amen' is especially interesting as it incorporates the Green 'Water Reed' glyph which we can know see as an abbreviation for the God 'Yah'. Yah or Iah was a well known Moon God throughout the Ancient Middle East, whilst 'Amen' or 'Ymn' was another general name for the One God who appears in Egypt about the time of the first Shepherd Kings, named Hyksos by the Greeks. The red 'Gaming Board' glyph with wavy line beneath it, spell out 'MN' for us, and so we have the full God name of 'Amen' in first place in the cartouche. This cartouche is that of MERI YMN HOREMHEB, so once again, the god name is written first but spoken later in the name. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:48:05 GMT -5
Many will be familiar with the name YAHWEH, yet have no idea whatsoever that this is simply the plural form of the God, YAH or IAH. Genesis 1:26 “Let us make man in OUR image after OUR likeness These cartouches all have the Water Reed Glyph, either single as YAH or duplicated as YAHWEH: Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:51:57 GMT -5
The duplication of this God Name is very important. It seems to first appear in Egypt about the same time as the Shepherd Kings and Khyan or CAIN was one of the earliest Kings to have this God Name. One may rightly ask how it is that we can get YAHWEH from two identical glyphs, and this is where some knowledge of Egyptian hieroglyphs is necessary. The Egyptian plural letter was the letter 'W' shown in the first line of glyphs in this extract by a 'Quail Chick' glyph. So, while the script repeats the same letter, 'Y', in speech it is YW, and pronounced as 'IW' or 'IO'. Alternatively, and we know this from the Bible, this God(s) was spoken of as 'YahWeh'. According to Gerald Massey in his great work, 'Ancient Egypt – Light of the World' (1907), those who worshipped Iah/Io, became known as 'Jews': This extract from a British Museum publication explains – Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:54:51 GMT -5
According to Gerald Massey in his great work, 'Ancient Egypt – Light of the World' (1907), those who worshipped Iah/Io, became known as 'Jews': " There was a religion of the god Іu or Iao in Egypt thirteen thousand years ago. That god was Atum-Ιu, born son of Ptah. He was the earliest father in heaven because he was the divine Ra in his primordial sovereignty. He is the god in two persons who was first figured as the sun upon the double horizon = the father in the west, the son in the east. This god went forth from Kam by several names and various routes. Those who worshipped him as Atum became the Adamites, the Edomites, the red men; those who worshipped him as Iao, Iah, or Іu became the Jews in many lands and these are the Jews of that world-wide dispersion recognized by Isaiah, which did not follow any known historical exodus from Egypt or captivity in Babylon, or migration from Palestine." Note: Kam is Egyptian for 'Black'. With the suffix letter 't' it becomes 'Kmt' and thus 'The Black Land', which is how Egyptians looked at the dark soil deposited by the Nile to create their land that we now call Egypt. ... As mentioned, Egyptians saw their God as a Trinity, and the Egyptian word for 'Son' is the letter 'S' followed by a glottal stop, so sounding something like 'Suh' or 'Sah'. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:56:34 GMT -5
Each and every King of Egypt from the time of the Shepherd Kings onwards, was believed to be the living Son of God, who came annually to cause the Nile inundation and resurrect the land into new life. When the King died, the Son became the Father, namely 'Uasar' and the new King was the Son resurrected into a new life.
HE BECAME KNOWN AS THE COMING SON, IWSA, pronounced 'IOSA'.
This name has never changed in Gaelic:
Mark 8:33 Ach IOSA a tionndadh, sheall e air a dheisciopuil, is bhagair e air Peadar, ag radh: Theirig air mo chulaobh, a shatain: oir chan eil tlachd agad do nithean Dhe, ach do nithean dhaoine.
Massey explained the name in this extract from his book:
"Ptah was the earliest form of an eternal father manifesting in the person of an ever-coming son, who, as the coming one, was Iu, or Iu-em-hetep, he who comes with peace. Hence we derive the name or title of the Egypto-gnostic Jesus from Iu-Su, or Iusa, the coming son."
Along came the Greeks under Alexander in the 4th century BCE and many names were Hellenised for their home consumption. So IOSA was turned into Iesous and then this became in English JESUS, whilst Hebrews knew him as Yeshua and Arabs as Issa or Essa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 19:59:34 GMT -5
HEBREW No less a person than the Roman Catholic Bishop, St.Ambrose, confirmed that Jesus was Egyptian. He did this, possibly at great risk from the Church, in a very subtle way. St.Ambrose referred to Jesus many times as 'THE GOOD SCARABAEUS'. This is an absolute giveaway, for the SCARAB was an Egyptian Symbol of the greatest importance. In Hieroglyphs it is a 'Dung Beetle' for which the Egyptian word was HEPRE. (Hebrew has many words in common with Egyptian and very often there is a change from a soft consonant to a hard one, thus 'p' becomes 'b', 's' becomes 'sh' and 't' becomes 'd', or vice versa). 'Hepre' was Egyptian for 'coming into existence' or 'creation'. The dung beetle appeared out of lifeless piles of dung, so they saw it as being creation out of nothing. As we have seen, the Egyptian plural is formed by adding the letter 'W', repeating the word, or by adding three vertical strokes. The cartouche below is on the side of the Shrine containing the three coffins of YMN TWT ANKH, commonly known today as 'King Twt'. The reconstructed face at the beginning of this thread is that of the young King. The Sun Disc is 'RE' or 'GOD', the Scarab is 'HEPRE', the three vertical strokes make it plural, and so letter 'W', and the bowl at the bottom is 'NEB'. Since Neb follows the noun it means 'ALL'. This cartouche therefore reads 'GOD OF ALL HEPREW', or fully in English, 'GOD OF ALL CREATIONS'. I could have shown any 18th Dynasty king as being the real Jesus, but Ymn Twt Ankh was Special. His name means 'AMEN TWT (HEBREW DWD meaning DAVID) ANKH' - 'The Living God David'. The emphasis in including the word 'Ankh' for Living, may well be because the Priests of Amen had resurrected the dead Prince Twt Ms (Born of David) to reign again symbolically in opposition to the hated Moses/Akhenaten. The dead prince's tomb was found to be empty, sealed by Twt no less, and articles that were once the prince's were found in Twt's tomb. Now we can see the importance of proving that the fable Jesus of the gospels was descended from David. In reality, they were one and the same !!! Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Sept 12, 2012 20:13:41 GMT -5
What we do know without the shadow of any doubt is that ancient Egyptians believed in JESUS. They called him the Ever Coming son - IOSA - and this is still the same name for Jesus today, in Gaelic. The Greeks started the confusion by Hellenising this name into IESOUS and the English then changed the initial 'I' to J, and the Hebrews nobbled it too - into Yeshua. We also know that this Jesus was also seen by later generations of Egyptians and Greeks to be one and the same as HR (Greek Horus) - for were they not both the son of God? What is quite surprising is that Jean Cocteau knew this back in the early 1960's when he painted this mural for the Church of Notre Dame de Paris in London. Here we have the crucified figure not only being deliberately ignored by those surrounding the cross, but only the legs of the crucifed are shown. The rest of the body is pointedly left out. Instead we have the Roman Soldier's Shield placed so that it appears that the Falcon - the Symbol for Horus - is sitting on Cocteau's shoulder. Cocteau knew the truth. But how did he know? This is the real mystery. He could have read Gerald Massey, but I very much doubt it. Somehow this knowledge was known by some inner circles - most likely the Vatican, or perhaps descendants of the Templar knights - and Cocteau learned of it. A few years back I had confirmation from Tom Harpur - author of "The Pagan Christ" and ex Anglican minister that this is what Cocteau was trying to show the World: hi Malcolm: You're quite right. That's the Horus image and symbol. He was depicted with the golden falcon (the sun hieroglyph) on his shoulder. Jean Cocteau knew the ancient world of symbols well. Thanks for drawing this to my attention. Tom Harpur... Cocteau has even highlighted Horus by painting the Falcon blue. Showing this symbol in a scene where all the main characters are turning their backs to the literal Jesus and only painting in his legs at that, is a clear message that Cocteau knew where the Jesus story came from. I now wonder whether he had read Massey, or was it because as Grand Master of the Priory of Sion the truth has been handed down through the ages in this Society? If so they most likely learned it from the Knights Templar. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Jan 23, 2016 18:40:24 GMT -5
The duplication of this God Name is very important. It seems to first appear in Egypt about the same time as the Shepherd Kings and Khyan or CAIN was one of the earliest Kings to have this God Name. One may rightly ask how it is that we can get YAHWEH from two identical glyphs, and this is where some knowledge of Egyptian hieroglyphs is necessary. The Egyptian plural letter was the letter 'W' shown in the first line of glyphs in this extract by a 'Quail Chick' glyph. So, while the script repeats the same letter, 'Y', in speech it is YW, and pronounced as 'IW' or 'IO'. Alternatively, and we know this from the Bible, this God(s) was spoken of as 'YahWeh'. According to Gerald Massey in his great work, 'Ancient Egypt – Light of the World' (1907), those who worshipped Iah/Io, became known as 'Jews': We have some remarkable evidence that the Double Water Reed hieroglyphs were pronounced as 'IU' because they are in an Irish legend: "Kian, the story goes, was sent northward by Lugh to summon the fighting men of the Danaans in Ulster to the hosting against the Fomorians. On his way, as he crosses the Plain of Murthemney, near Dundalk, he meets with three brothers, Brian, Iuchar, and Iucharba, sons of Turenn, between whose house and that of Kian there was a blood-feud. He seeks to avoid them by changing into the form of a pig and joining a herd which is rooting in the plain, but the brothers detect him and Brian wounds him with a cast from a spear. Kian, knowing that his end is come, begs to be allowed to change back into human form before he is slain. "I had liefer kill a man than a pig," says Brian, who takes throughout the leading part in all the brothers' adventures. Kian then stands before them as a man, with the blood from Brian's spear trickling from his breast. "I have outwitted ye," he cries, "for if ye had slain a pig ye would have paid but the eric [blood fine] of a pig, but now ye shall pay the eric of a man; never was greater eric than that which ye shall pay; and the weapons ye slay me with shall tell the tale to the avenger of blood." Source - Rolleston's 'Celtic Myths and Legends'. Elsewhere in these pages I have shown how the name of the Pharaoh 'Iucharba' was written. Just to recap, the 'IU' prefix is the God Name which leaves us with H(aspirated) B R. This is exactly how the Ancient Hebrew Kings of Egypt would have written the name HBL which is 'ABEL' and there can be no doubt because the next Pharaoh was Khyan. So here we have an Irish Legend which gives the impression that Abel and Cain were Irish. Now that we know that Ancient Egyptians invaded and colonized Ireland in the Bronze Age then it makes more sense that they were recalling the Kings they left behind in Egypt. IUchar would have to be the name of HAR (called Horus by the Greeks) prefixed by the same Yah Weh God Name, i.e. Iu. |
|
|
|
Post by IsacLof on Jan 18, 2022 9:18:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by IsacLof on Feb 24, 2022 21:58:30 GMT -5
|
|
